Kurt, the projection-layer move is the one that lands hardest in regulated industries. I believe that NGSI-LD context brokers are a developer-friendly implementation of the pattern; clinical research is where I have interest in operationalizing it. The 'noisy sensor' framing is the architectural argument I have been looking for: an LLM-extracted assertion becomes evidentiary only at the boundary where a named human attests. The shape graph is the contract; the attestation is the wasAttributedTo edge.
Thank you very much for quoting me. This is not exactly what I wrote in the comment section of the previous article, but at least it will please Jessica Talisman :) and I will not challenge the masters or interfere with this remarkable demonstration.
Moreover, I entirely agree with the general principle stated about SKOS: "SKOS is not merely a shallow hierarchy language. It is an annotational governance framework" and also on most of your very high-level, very enlightening and innovative analyses, served by a vast knowledge of computer history.
The inner-domain SKOS argument lands every time I make it in clinical research. prefLabel/altLabel/hiddenLabel is what lets one ontology serve investigators, CRCs, statisticians, and regulatory writers without flattening any role's vocabulary into another's. SKOS as conceptual governance is where the operational reality of regulated work lives. Your push to keep SKOS at the base of the stack is the right one.
Kurt, the projection-layer move is the one that lands hardest in regulated industries. I believe that NGSI-LD context brokers are a developer-friendly implementation of the pattern; clinical research is where I have interest in operationalizing it. The 'noisy sensor' framing is the architectural argument I have been looking for: an LLM-extracted assertion becomes evidentiary only at the boundary where a named human attests. The shape graph is the contract; the attestation is the wasAttributedTo edge.
Thank you very much for quoting me. This is not exactly what I wrote in the comment section of the previous article, but at least it will please Jessica Talisman :) and I will not challenge the masters or interfere with this remarkable demonstration.
Moreover, I entirely agree with the general principle stated about SKOS: "SKOS is not merely a shallow hierarchy language. It is an annotational governance framework" and also on most of your very high-level, very enlightening and innovative analyses, served by a vast knowledge of computer history.
The inner-domain SKOS argument lands every time I make it in clinical research. prefLabel/altLabel/hiddenLabel is what lets one ontology serve investigators, CRCs, statisticians, and regulatory writers without flattening any role's vocabulary into another's. SKOS as conceptual governance is where the operational reality of regulated work lives. Your push to keep SKOS at the base of the stack is the right one.
Thanks for your answer. Your comment is also a tribute to Kurt Cagle :)
This is beautiful. Thank you!