Kurt, thank for setting up this working group. I talked to Ora Lassila at KGC Conference last month and send him a copy of the spec. I have not heard from him yet. He told me after the publication of RDF 1.2 specs at end of the year, the RDF specification will be open like HTML and contributions to RDF standard will be easier to integrated. My hope is that the holonic extension to RDF will be part of RDF spec down the road. I truly believe that it needs to be part of the RDF fabric, thus being agnostic of any domain.
I just join the group. I am not so familiar with the W3C process related to Community WG but I will do my best to stay engaged as much as possible.
Hi, Stephane, I was hoping that you'd get involved with this.
What I'm hoping to do with the Holon Graph working group is to open up a number of different subgroups that are focused on various aspects of the architecture, and from that determine what would be considered a canonical architecture and methodology. I'm also trying to salvage at least some of the previous architecture that you, I and Scott all had a hand in, as there were a lot of good ideas there.
One thing I've been thinking about - we were beginning to explore actions, but given how SHACL has evolved, I've been thinking a lot about integration with ODRL, SKOS, and Prov-O as specific holonic structure (which is to say, enveloping structure, not payload). I've had clients that are coming in with payloads in BFO/CCO, gUFO, and Gist (and we need to have a good story for talking about those payload schemas) but the next stage for Holons is just defining what exactly they are, and to do that, we need proposals like the one you posted above. By the way, the W3C Holon Graph Community Group is now live. https://www.w3.org/groups/cg/holon/.
Maybe when w3c makes their password retrieval less obnoxious. Otherwise I'd gladly support it.
Kurt, thank for setting up this working group. I talked to Ora Lassila at KGC Conference last month and send him a copy of the spec. I have not heard from him yet. He told me after the publication of RDF 1.2 specs at end of the year, the RDF specification will be open like HTML and contributions to RDF standard will be easier to integrated. My hope is that the holonic extension to RDF will be part of RDF spec down the road. I truly believe that it needs to be part of the RDF fabric, thus being agnostic of any domain.
I just join the group. I am not so familiar with the W3C process related to Community WG but I will do my best to stay engaged as much as possible.
Gladly support it, the link to the proposed group didnt show me the proposed group or how i could support it -- let me know how ... thanks
Hi Kurt! I propose the following specification for holonic rdf. https://geoknoesis.github.io/rdf-holon/
Hi, Stephane, I was hoping that you'd get involved with this.
What I'm hoping to do with the Holon Graph working group is to open up a number of different subgroups that are focused on various aspects of the architecture, and from that determine what would be considered a canonical architecture and methodology. I'm also trying to salvage at least some of the previous architecture that you, I and Scott all had a hand in, as there were a lot of good ideas there.
One thing I've been thinking about - we were beginning to explore actions, but given how SHACL has evolved, I've been thinking a lot about integration with ODRL, SKOS, and Prov-O as specific holonic structure (which is to say, enveloping structure, not payload). I've had clients that are coming in with payloads in BFO/CCO, gUFO, and Gist (and we need to have a good story for talking about those payload schemas) but the next stage for Holons is just defining what exactly they are, and to do that, we need proposals like the one you posted above. By the way, the W3C Holon Graph Community Group is now live. https://www.w3.org/groups/cg/holon/.